Testiez — QA testing services and QA workspace for software teams.Keep Society Drug‑Free.Keep Your Product Bug‑Free.Give It to . Your Mind Stays Free.

Our QA team runs the complete testing lifecycle for your product. We agree the test scope, write structured test cases, group them into suites, execute them against your build, record every result, file bugs with reproduction evidence, retest your fixes, run regression across previously passing cases, and close with a QA submission and a formal sign-off decision.

Testing is priced per cycle rather than per test case, because the number of cases depends on your scope. A single release or product area tested end to end, a full product QA cycle across every module, and a dedicated QA engineer embedded in your sprints are three separate engagements. Scope is agreed before any work starts, so the price is fixed before you commit.

A release-level cycle covering one product area typically runs about two weeks. A full product QA cycle across every in-scope module typically runs about four weeks. An embedded QA engineer works continuously to your sprint cadence instead of to a cycle length.

We build a disciplined manual QA foundation first. Structured manual testing is what proves which flows actually matter and which cases are worth keeping; automation is worth adding once that suite exists. Automating an unproven suite mostly automates the wrong checks.

A QA submission covering the testing scope, total and executed cases, passed, failed and blocked counts, suites executed, bugs identified, fixed and pending, tickets raised, retesting and regression results, known issues, remaining risks and the final QA status — plus a documented sign-off: QA Approved, QA Approved with Known Issues, or QA Not Approved.

Yes. Every test scope, test case, suite, execution history, regression case, bug record, QA report and sign-off stays in your workspace. That is the point of the model: the engagement leaves you a QA foundation your own team can re-run next release, rather than a PDF that expires.

A failed test case is filed into the BugList with the tester's notes as the description, plus screenshots, supporting links, severity, bug type, the module under test, and links back to the test case and the execution that found it. Bugs are then bundled into tickets for your developers — grouped by severity, type or module, one ticket per bug, or mapped onto a ticket that already exists.

Every bug follows Reported to Fixed to Retested to Verified. Once your developers ship a fix, we retest against the original test case. If the issue still reproduces, it goes back for further resolution instead of quietly closing. "Fixed" is a developer's claim; "Verified" is a tested fact.

Yes, in two ways. Your team can use the Testiez workspace on its own to manage cases, suites, runs, bugs, retesting, regression, submissions and sign-offs in one place. Or our QA team can work alongside yours on a cycle, then hand the assets over so your testers continue from a populated case library rather than a blank page.

Web applications, SaaS products, internal business applications, enterprise applications, customer portals, admin platforms, mobile and responsive experiences, API-driven applications, and end-to-end business workflows that cross several of those.

Regression testing re-executes previously passing test cases after new changes land, so a fix in one module does not silently break another. It is included, and it gets cheaper every release because the suite already exists and carries forward instead of being rebuilt.

The decision is documented against evidence, not against an informal "testing is done". QA Approved means the agreed scope completed and the release criteria were met. QA Approved with Known Issues means testing completed with non-blocking issues that are each documented with impact and workaround. QA Not Approved means critical issues or unresolved risks remain.